iFANN
    搜索 iFANN...
    登录
    首页
    新闻
    视频
    图片
    GIF
    探索
    投票
    大奖
    iFAMOUS
    维基
    动漫
    聊天室
    通知
    私信
    收藏
    我的
    维基大奖iFAMOUS排行榜行业创作者奖励用户奖励条款隐私社区准则下架 / DMCA帮助开发者

    © 2026 iFANN

    首页
    搜索
    私信
    提醒
    我的

    帖子

    Oceanee
    Oceanee@oceanee
    🎤NewJeans⭐JIHYO

    Danielle Seeks Separate ADOR Case

    Danielle's lawyers have petitioned the court handling the ADOR legal dispute to separate her individual proceedings from those involving Min Hee-jin and her mother. The team contended that including additional individuals serves only to prolong proceedings unnecessarily while also restricting the other NewJeans artists from moving forward. They pointed out that focusing solely on Danielle would allow for a swift resolution since supporting evidence for the allegations appears lacking. Furthermore, they stressed the need for an expedited conclusion to permit Danielle to resume her professional work in the entertainment field. The presiding judge consented to this request and directed ADOR to explain the rationale for involving multiple parties when the core issue seems limited to a contract violation. Additionally, the judge sought clarification on the definition and basis of any accusations regarding interference or tampering.

    3mo

    484 赞48 踩90 转发3 评论
    ?

    评论

    还没有评论。来抢沙发吧!

    帖子

    Oceanee
    Oceanee@oceanee
    🎤NewJeans⭐JIHYO

    Danielle Seeks Separate ADOR Case

    Danielle's lawyers have petitioned the court handling the ADOR legal dispute to separate her individual proceedings from those involving Min Hee-jin and her mother. The team contended that including additional individuals serves only to prolong proceedings unnecessarily while also restricting the other NewJeans artists from moving forward. They pointed out that focusing solely on Danielle would allow for a swift resolution since supporting evidence for the allegations appears lacking. Furthermore, they stressed the need for an expedited conclusion to permit Danielle to resume her professional work in the entertainment field. The presiding judge consented to this request and directed ADOR to explain the rationale for involving multiple parties when the core issue seems limited to a contract violation. Additionally, the judge sought clarification on the definition and basis of any accusations regarding interference or tampering.

    3mo

    484 赞48 踩90 转发3 评论
    ?

    评论

    还没有评论。来抢沙发吧!